OSLO: It could be called one of the decade’s most important transport policy recommendations is now ready for publication.
Mayor Tage Pettersen says that he has never been away for cards that have been sitting so close that when it comes KVU’en and the new crossing of the Oslo Fjord.
– I’m really a little little nervous, says the mayor of Moss adds that on the basis of the few signals he has received so it can look bright for his part.
Tage Pettersen has always wanted a solution south of Moss.
Another is in place Jørn Wille in Nei til fjord crossing over Jeloy.
– Our agenda is that Jeloy saved and that the spirit of landscape protection is maintained.
What happens now is that the mayors first to enter and get familiar with the plan for the new inlet connection. This starts at 08:30.
The report is written by the Norwegian Public Roads Administration on behalf of the Ministry of Transport and Helen Holm and Anders Jordbakke was early space with document all waiting.
Moss newspaper following the case consecutively and will also send live video from the press conference at 09.30 am. At the press conference will veidirektør Terje Moe Gustavsen and project manager Anders Jordbakke answer questions.
After this moss-avis.no obtain reactions to what is presented.
DIRECT NOW:
The press conference starts:
The document we have received at the hands show that Horten and Jeloy stand out as landing points for bridge and tunnel. A railroad is not market, it is stated.
This is read:
“It recommended further investigation and planning of a fixed road corridor Moss-Horten. A fast connection provides the greatest benefit to road users and contributors to the region enlargement. Horten and Jeloy stand out as landing points for bridge or tunnel from traffic impacts and factors related to soil conditions, technology, costs, and opportunities for limited space conflicts. “
It is Anders Jordbakke now account for selection. He says Bru Moss-Horten provides better opportunities for public transport and cycling and for linking urban areas closer together than the tunnel.
In the short term, it is recommended that Highway 19 is developed with a high frequency and most environmentally friendly ferry offers as outlined in the concept K1 Improved ferry deals. This assumes that highway 19 through Moss developed as recommended in KVU for highway systems in Moss and Rygge.
- And so it will not be possible to avoid some space conflicts in such large projects, says Jordbakke.
No train
When it comes to rail so you do not see that the market can justify an investment in the order of 40-50 billion.
In the longer term, it may be appropriate to consider a Oslofjord Crossing over Hurum in the continuing effort to develop the railway.
Veidirektør Terje Moe Gustavsen: – We are committed to a relatively rapid decision-making. Now we presents this to the minister.
That’s Transport Minister Ketil Solvik-Olsen receiving the recommendations are now presenting.
Bridge or tunnel?
Moss Avis has on several occasions discussed the options and challenges; it will be a bridge over the bay, tunnel or maybe both? Or still recommended ferry operation?
Should we plan for the future fjord crossing with or without rail and is the area by Larkollen or Drøbak recommended on this side of the bay for future solution? And what are the consequences for cultural and residential areas?
READ ALSO: Here’s the overview of the various crossing options
No comments:
Post a Comment