There are many years ago Director of Roads stated that now there must be an end to the deep, expensive and flammable undersea tunnel projects, nor invest in modern bridge technology. He also initiated a major investment in educations bridge engineers at the University of Trondheim.
The management of our roads department has long worked in the opposite direction and planning undersea tunnels of Halsa-Todal Fjord Langfjorden-Hafast, not to mention Møre axis (Berg and Dahl-path). Now they have been forced to give up all together, except Møre axis, in favor of bridge options. One has already squandered a lot of millions due to backward technology and mindset.
But have they learned anything? Oh no! Nor have they taken into account the fact all tunnel accidents, with associated long closures and unstable opening of tunnels in recent years. Not fully reflect the our security or increased greenhouse emissions by the deep tunnels. They are not interested in safeguarding bikers or pedestrians, or protect passengers’ health against dangerous exhaust, particulate matter and the risk of fire in tunnels. At the weekend 25/6 killed 35 bus passengers in a bus fire in China, and it was not in a tunnel, but imagine choirs much worse it had gone in a tunnel at 16 km, and a total depth of 430 m. We have had several fires with buses tunnel in Norway, and here try again vegsjefen and assert that Møre axis is only 350m long, he must have forgotten that it goes over the ocean and up to Julsundbroa. A misstatement of 80 m and it is additionally 130m deeper than NPRA own proposal to tunnel from Molde to sack, and who also was 3 km shorter.
So talking vegsjefen about concepts and selection of these, yeah choice fell course at the worst concept in relation to the cost / benefit, it says in the quality assurance for Molde Ålesund on page 46. I have also had discussions with Reinertsen why not there was something about the benefits of Sack Fast when road authority proposed tunnels, when option in Felleskjøpet via backpack and bridge option Vågstranda also lasted the shortest route to the Southeast, in addition to being the shortest route between Kristiansand and Trondheim, he was silent, but admitted to having talked about it. He lasted enough pressure to refrain from mentioning the benefits, it was the one commissioned to Møre axis, so growth by approximately 50% greater earnings, and 4-5 billion. spared an additional bridge should not come Sack Wired to good cost / benefit is not interesting for the leaders on roads department. Man operates a aloud game with manipulation and misinformation. Also one of vegetate best project managers have set many challengers questions about the old technology you represent. It is also well known that most of the roads department actually supports Sack Fast, also retired executives, but most dare not come forward. For follow the results for employees, although I have gone against the same way politically while I was employed in the same agency, and prevailed both times, but the pipeline was also I prone to dismissal threats.
Can you tell me how many there are in Møre og Romsdal who want 90km of tunnels roundtrip between Molde and Ålesund? There are no drivers, no tourists, no transport, no sick lists, not the soft road users, not commuters, they can not afford the expensive tolls, and they never come to a halt, operation and maintenance are here so extremely expensive that here it becomes payment forever, it is also calculated in a similar dream projects.
to run Molde Ålesund round trip will be the same as running Oppdølsstranda tunnel at 7.43 km 12 times, or Innfjordtunellen at 6.6 kilometers 13 times. Has great difficulty understanding that anyone at all can vouch for such a tragic solution, but time and again it is taken in defense of newspapers, politicians and management at our local roads department. In addition you making chaos in and out of Molde, while you deny that most people today are coming by car with Vestnes-ferry actually not going to Molde, even roads department even helped to add up to a good and safe analysis credibility is entirely absent in relation to the roads department, it may even seem like the same also applies to the Authority, the project is currently also omitted from the Norwegian Transport Plan, and it probably never will come back. Think time also has come EXIT Møre Axis family. E39 is for and take care of a main road through the county, and throughout Western and Trøndelag, none of these need a costly flammable and unstable detour with tunnels through Molde and under Tautra. This road is only to create advantages for a few political activists and roads department managers with self-constructed advantages, not the users of E39.
Sack Fast focusing on security, bridges and roads in the day, and by far the fastest and most beautiful road through the county, an attraction in the middle of Gullruten between Geiranger-Trollstigen and the Atlantic road, and with accessibility for bikers and pedestrians. And in addition to ferry freely E39, it will also be ferry freely to the Southeast, for all of North og Romsdal! Which vegsjefen never willing to comment. It will also increase the availability of new hospital on Hjelset in from the south, the opposite of the Møre axis will do. Sack Real is by far the best option compared to the cost / benefit, mobility, stable opening and without unstable tunnels. I urge all opponents to work on this. For more info, see Facebook Sekkfast.no. Send suggestions for submission of Møre axis before July 6, 2016 (effective Molde, by July 1, others).
Greeting Jon Ingar oak.
—
If you want to write in on the thread? Submit your short posts here!
If you want to write letters to the editor? Enter your post here!
You can find meaningful substance in northwestern debate – Rbnetts new opinion portal
Follow Northwestern Debate on Twitter
Follow Northwestern Debate on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment