ARENDAL (VG) Prime Minister Erna Solberg (H) signals that the treasures of Norway to be down. And then she Freder electric car in the harvest statsbudsjett.
The Prime Minister makes today a large skatteintervju in VG. She notices amongst other things, that there can be a new tax and wealth tax are not be removed.
– the treasures of Norway to be down, she says.
We sitter in the restaurant at Thon Hotel Arendal in Arendal Thursday morning. Coffee on the table. Black.
– You may perhaps, to give a written guarantee on tax facilitate all then?
– No, the sort I’m not holding on with. I vet too well that it probably will be some one else who perhaps, to not want to get. But ‘all’ is dekkende, in the sense that people will oppleve one generell decline in tax and avgiftsnivået.
– In the next year statsbudsjett
– I will not say noe of reach.
– The tall ships avgifter; elbilistene frykter kutt in benefits
– We la to grunn in klimaforliket the benefits will be until 2017 or until we have passert 50,000 cars. We have not been named yet done.
– It is to the stream bli more enn 50,000 next year?
– It is possible, but not this year so they have no plans on stream do something about the coming statsbudsjettet. But then there might be, we will adjust noe down banquets each, but I can promise motorists networks that in many years will be avgiftsfordeler by y drove out electric car.
She notices that there can be a new tax because utredningsarbeidet which will take place on holding tax that SSB sjef Hans Henrik Scheel leader may also have implications for personal taxation.
will open for tax
Selskapsskatten diaper on a reduced during Stoltenberg the government in Last year 28-27 prosent. Other countries have senket the like even more candy that is great avstand operation between selskapsskatten and personal taxation. The Prime Minister will wirel care.
– We’ll see huh Scheel-utvalg coming in November. This may have implications for våre ratings av personal income tax, so it can her we must take a broader skattedebatt.
– A new tax reform?
– Yes, it is her, we’ll see. Since the tax reform in 1992 and endringene in 2005, it has hosted lik taxation ‘work and capital. It is her we calendars on the building right next late. But it has its challenges: Skaper you for great glipe, will open the experience shows this to tax adjustments that we have GREiD y punch with today’s system.
– If we are Gjennom a candy debate, it is IMPORTANT årsaken y adjust the RAM to a future where we go from y be veldig oljeavhengig to stream bli litt less oljeavhengig. We must søke solutions that can give oss one myk landing. We must bruke vårt handlingsrom to stream skape nyskapning and new arbeidsplasser for y utvikle konkurransekraften when oljevirksomheten sakte crashes.
Do not pick enkeltnæringer
– Surely we ha a tax system which is adapted to the new phase in the Norwegian economy. We must get opp new næringer which is konkurransedyktige.
– Telenor sjef Baksaas Committee pointed out technology as part of the sort field?
– Yes, it is one but we can not Regretfully fin opp candy areas. There are many areas that we need to focus on: Biotechnology, fish, Sjømat, informasjonsteknologi and marine environments are noen. We as politicians can not pick enkeltnæringer, but we can Legge framework which will help ensuring. Oh bet on Science subjects is the sort element candy that we get people who have kompetansen to stream utvikle new technology.
– The wealth tax is betent because y remove it, will open for rike nullskatteytere
– The wealth tax is the largest systemfeilen in today’s tax system. It makes you tax capital in businesses uansett on the go with overskudd or underskudd. Yes, we do not want y ha nullskatteytere, so we will not stream to remove it. But we have promised that in the period, down from a 0.5 prosentpoeng.
– This is what many who expect?
– Yes, but then, the lese regjeringsplattformen. It is not that we should remove it, but we need to cut emissions and the øke bunnfradraget candy that usual people and small businesses skjermes.
– NHH professor and former Conservative Party-State Council Victor Norman financing to the stream preserve the Norwegian model, then the capital / the rike tax increased more rapidly. He shows to the technological Developments in the world has bidratt a forskyvning av capital for the richest?
– It is difficult for one country y kople seg free from the Developments. The capital is flyttbar and go your the best that framework. Instead, we must jobbe to not m staying noen skattekonkurranse by y jobbe mot tax havens, candy that we Tetter hullene. I think it’s nice that Norman did not see that capital can be moved and he makes it into a debate about the Norwegian model.
No comments:
Post a Comment