Immigration has after four months finally arrived with the answer, NRK Trøndelag. She is now preparing for the trial according to NRK.
“UNE assumes assessment of PST and their recommendation that the applicant is not granted a residence with reference to the relevant employment. UNE of vital importance assessment from PST, “writes Immigration in their refusal.
Preparing trial
Attorney Risnes said told NRK Trøndelag that the result was expected, but have difficulties to understand why it has such a long time.
– They repeat exactly the same as UDI said four months ago, so what they have spent time on, one might ask, says Risnes NRK.
Risnes is Hamideh Kaffash his attorney, and confirm that they are already underway to prepare for the trial, which they hope can get up early in the New Year in 2015.
Hamideh Kaffash were sent out of the country on September 15.
Has support at NTNU Rector
NTNU Rector Gunnar Bovim has previously said that he fears iranersakene do they lose the battle for “the best brains” and shows that other countries are not as stringent.
ALSO READ: Preparing lawsuit against the state
– It appears as something funny that one of the Iranians who application was rejected for a residence permit here, to continue their project in Sweden. Another has gone to MIT in the United States instead, says Bovim.
Hamideh Kaffash has previously called the expulsion breach of fundamental human rights.
– We do not mean that NTNU will break Norwegian and international rules, but this expulsion is based on completely wrong basis. I think patriotic Norwegian professors best know what is sensitive technology, Kaffash said earlier while she was still in Trondheim
Selected Norway
She pointed out that many Iranian scholars have had offers from other countries, but that they had decided to investigate Norway.
– We have not done anything wrong than to be born in our beloved homeland Iran. This applies not only us who are being sent out, many other Iranians have lost motivation after this happened, said Kaffash.
Immigration has justified the rejection that they are researching areas that are sensitive in connection with weapons of mass destruction. The academic community at NTNU believes, however, that their research does not have any relevance to weapons of mass destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment